An employee in your unit consistently completes tasks quickly but carelessly. A supervisor from a unit that is to receive him asks for your assessment. Which response is most appropriate?

• A. Point out this employee's good qualities only, since he may correct his bad qualities after his transfer is effected
• B. Say nothing good or bad about this employee, thus permitting him to start his new assignment with a clean slate
• C. Inform the unit chief that this clerk performed his work speedily but was careless
• D. Emphasize this employee's good points and minimize his bad points

Answer: (C)

When a supervisor asks for an assessment of an employee being moved to a new unit, the key is to be honest and specific about observable performance so the receiving unit can plan appropriately. The most appropriate approach is to report both what the employee does well and where there are ongoing concerns, in a factual, professional manner. In this case, the employee completes tasks quickly but is careless. Sharing this detail gives the unit chief a clear picture: there is efficiency, but quality may be at risk, suggesting the need for safeguards such as closer oversight, targeted training, or quality checks. This kind of candid, specific feedback helps the receiving unit anticipate challenges and allocate support or supervision accordingly.

Praising only strengths, remaining silent on weaknesses, or presenting a biased view that minimizes problems would deprive the receiving unit of essential information and could lead to problems after the transfer. Providing a balanced, truthful report supports accountability and informed decision-making.