If two workers argue about seating and lighting, what is the fairest corrective measure?

• A. Arrange seating to optimize lighting for most tasks
• B. Issue a memorandum
• C. Reprimand in front of staff
• D. Arbitrarily change seating

Answer: (A)

When conflict over seating and lighting arises, the fairest fix focuses on improving the actual work environment in a practical, equitable way that benefits the majority. Rearranging seating to optimize lighting for most tasks directly addresses the root issue by aligning workspace setup with what people actually do and what helps them work best. It’s a neutral, constructive adjustment that enhances comfort and productivity without targeting or embarrassing anyone, and it can be evaluated and tweaked after feedback.

By contrast, simply issuing a memorandum is a communication without solving the physical problem or resolving the disagreement. Reprimanding someone in front of colleagues is unprofessional and harms morale and trust. Arbitrarily changing seating without considering task needs, ergonomics, or safety can create new problems and feels unfair to the workers involved.

So, a collaborative, outcome-focused adjustment to seating and lighting that reflects how tasks are performed is the most fair and effective approach.